Tax the sin to save the

Why sin taxes are bad

However, policy papers tend to overstate the economic costs of activities like smoking because they rarely account for what would happen without them. When tax receipts first became available, the president of one of these nonprofits, the California Medical Association, actually admitted to legislators that his organization and the health charities were "fighting for this money like jackals over a carcass. So what changes the price is the diminution in the supply of the commodity. In Mexico the data show that the tax did lead poorer households to buy fewer sugar-sweetened drinks. He points out that in India alcohol consumption is rising despite heavy taxation. Sin taxes are especially regressive, since poorer people are more likely to smoke and tend to drink more alcohol and sugary drinks. The Roman sumptuary laws were introduced to underline social status and limit what people could spend on food, clothing and luxuries. Before the tax was introduced, the average Mexican drank no fewer than liters of sugary carbonated beverages a year — 40 percent more than Americans. In America, heart disease is linked to one in four deaths, and smoking to one in five. Excise taxes have a long history. This obviously represents a huge conflict of interest for the nonprofit organizations: Are their lobbying efforts directed at the cause they fight or merely at raising funds for their organizations? Recently, however, the arguments for imposing new excise taxes and increasing existing ones have reemerged across party lines and have spawned several myths about the efficacy of sin taxation. So a further concern is that they affect low-income households most. Lexington, Mass: D. And fizzy drinks are disproportionally drunk by teenagers, who are more sensitive to price changes.

Senior Advisor, U. This highlights the fact that producers do not directly control the prices at which their products will sell. See Kelly D. What, then, are we to think of excise taxes?

sin tax pros and cons

Sales fell by 5. But once you start putting some flesh on its bare bones it starts to look less savoury. The portion of human deaths from non-communicable disease rising is a victory not a defeat.

Why are sin taxes good

Even people who do not pay taxes find themselves paying for these goodies in the form of higher prices for the things they really want. Not long after, parliament also introduced heavy levies on tea. Nevertheless, as policy instruments, sin taxes are extremely blunt. To help solve the obesity problem, some localities have already begun to impose "hefty" taxes on sugared sodas and sports drinks to reduce obesity in the United States. Gary M. In both places, sales of bottled water rose after the fizzy-drinks tax came in. Some examples can be fairly clear-cut. For young smokers, the switch to cigarettes with higher tar and nicotine is so large that tax hikes actually increase average daily tar and nicotine consumption. We have dealt with smallpox, we are with polio, and cholera is at least treatable these days and also largely prevented by good sewage systems. Denmark, which instituted a tax on fat-laden foods in , ran into similar problems.

That makes it possible to load heavy tax burdens on the tabs and toping before people stop doing them, meaning we can raise lots of money this way. But they do tend to require more medical attention than their healthier peers, often spanning the course of several decades.

Tax the sin to save the

In response, the armies of the righteous have already waged war on sugar, and now red meat is in their sights. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines obesity as a BMI of 30 or more; people between 25 and 30 are considered overweight. These funds usually go into the general fund or toward other politically favored causes.

Sin tax examples

Lexington, Mass: D. Taxes on tobacco substantially pre-date the discovery in the s of the link to lung cancer, being first introduced in England in and the US in But it is still more responsive than for many common household goods. Flesh-and-blood humans struggle with self-control. Policy is led by the issues du jour and fails to tackle the underlying, long-term problems. Advocates of taxes on vices such as smoking and obesity argue that they also impose negative externalities on the public, since governments have to spend more to take care of sick people. Yelvington, "Excise Taxes in Historical Perspective," 31— That depends, to no small degree, upon what we think of taxes in general.

Those goods and services—not the pieces of paper that pay for them—are the real cost of government to the taxpayers. Not long after, parliament also introduced heavy levies on tea.

Research has shown that when the price of a "sinful" good increases, consumers often substitute an equally "bad" good in its place.

Rated 10/10 based on 7 review
The Economics of Sin Taxes